Peran Religiusitas Terhadap Subjective Well-being Pada Muslim Penyintas COVID-19

Cut Metia

Abstract


Pandemi COVID-19 pada umumnya menimbulkan berbagai gangguan psikologis, seperti cemas, stres, kecewa, dan perasaan tertekan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji peran religiusitas terhadap subjective well-being pada muslim penyintas COVID-19. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah skala subjective well-being dan skala religiusitas. Purposive sampling digunakan untuk mendapatkan 109 responden muslim penyintas COVID-19. Analisis data menggunakan SPSS versi 26. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan korelasi r product moment dapat diketahui bahwa terdapat hubungan positif antara religiusitas dengan subjective well-being pada muslim penyintas COVID-19, dimana nilai rxy 0,578 dengan P = 0,000 < 0,050, artinya semakin tinggi religiusitas maka semakin tinggi subjective well-being maka hipotesis yang diajukan pada penelitian ini dinyatakan diterima. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini sebagai bahan rujukan untuk membuat suatu intervensi psikologis ketika menghadapi bencana kesehatan atau wabah dengan memgembangkan suatu modul pelatihan peningkatan religiusitas pada muslim penyintas Covid-19, serta memberikan seminar pentingnya kesejahteraan pada setiap individu yang menghadapi masalah.

Keywords


Religiusitas; Subjective Well-being; Muslim Penyintas COVID-19.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ancok, D., & Suroso, F. N. (2011). Psikologi Islam . Pustaka Pelajar.

Baldassarre, A., Giorgi, G., Alessio, F., Lulli, L. G., Arcangeli, G., & Mucci, N. (2020). Stigma and Discrimination (SAD) at the Time of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176341

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Cucinotta, D., & Vanelli, M. (2020). WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomedica, 91(1), 157-160. 10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397.

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34

Doane, M. J. (2013). The association between religiosity and subjective well-being: The unique contribution of religious service attendance and the mediating role of perceived religious social support. Irish Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2013.775071

Dodge, R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4

Feeney, B.C., & Collins, N.L. (2016). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-147. Doi:10.1177/1088868314544222.

Gheinaghi, A., Sanagoo, A., & Jouybari, L. (2018). The relationship between religious beliefs, social support and optimism in students of golestan university of medical sciences. Journal of Advances in Medical Education (JAMED), 1(2), 26–29.

Kemenkes. (2020). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No. HK.02.01/Menkes/202/2020. Tentang Protokol Isolasi Diri Sendiri dalam Pengendalian Coronavirus Diesease (COVID-19).

Kurniawan, Y., & Susilo, I. N. M. (2021). Bangkit Pascainfeksi: Dinamika Resiliensi pada Penyintas Covid-19. Philanthropy Journal of Psychology, 5(1), 131–156. http://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/philanthropy

Kusumawardhani, N. (2021). Fokus Pada Lingkaran Kecil. In Y. Kurniawan & Moordinigsih (Eds.), Pandemi dan Kesehatan Jiwa; Derap Psikolog Klinis untuk Indonesia (1st ed., pp. 57–71). Rajawali Press.

Mothamaha, L. V. (2007). THE NEEDS OF FET LEARNERS FOR PERSONAL WELL-BEING. University of South Africa.

Pennington, T. (2020). The coronavirus preparedness handbook (Simon & Schuster, Eds.). Skyhorse Publishing.

Sahoo, S., Mehra, A., Suri, V., Malhotra, P., Yaddanapudi, L. N., Dutt Puri, G., & Grover, S. (2020). Lived experiences of the corona survivors (patients admitted in COVID wards): A narrative real-life documented summaries of internalized guilt, shame, stigma, anger. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(May), 102187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102187

Shams, K., & Kadow, A. (2022). COVID-19 and Subjective well-being in Urban Pakistan in the beginning of the pandemic: A socio-economic analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10114-3

Shihab, Q. M. (2020). Corona Ujian Tuhan. Sikap Muslim Menghadapinya. Lentera Hati.

Siedlecki, K. L., Salthouse, T. A., Oishi, S., & Jeswani, S. (2014). The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Well-Being Across Age. Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0361-4

Singh, S., Bhutani, S., & Fatima, H. (2020). Surviving the stigma: lessons learnt for the prevention of COVID-19 stigma and its mental health impact. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 24(3), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-05-2020-0030

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D-MPKK. Alfabeta.

Suhail, K., & Chaudhry, H. R. (2004). Predictors of Subjective Well-Being in an Eastern Muslim Culture. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.3.359.35451

Taylor, S. (2019). The Psychology of Pandemics_ Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease (2019, Cambridge Scholars Publishing) - libgen.lc (Stefen Taylor, Ed.; First). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Villani, D., Sorgente, A., Iannello, P., & Antonietti, A. (2019). The Role of Spirituality and Religiosity in Subjective Well-Being of Individuals With Different Religious Status. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01525

Zhang, H., Hook, J. N., van Tongeren, D. R., Davis, E. B., Aten, J. D., McElroy-Heltzel, S., Davis, D. E., Shannonhouse, L., Hodge, A. S., & Captari, L. E. (2021). Spiritual fortitude: A systematic review of the literature implications for COVID-19 coping. Spirituality in Clinical Practice. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/scp0000267




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51849/ig.v4i3.262

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.